Jack Blumenau and Benjamin Lauderdale, “Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste”, Journal of Politics, forthcoming

 download pdf

When exogenous shocks make status quo policies less attractive, legislators be- come more tolerant to proposed alternatives that are further from their ideal in general political dimensions. This increases the discretion of legislative agenda-setters, and allows them to pass policy that would have been impossible in the absence of a crisis. We argue that this dynamic explains changes in voting patterns of the European Parliament during the period of the financial crisis, given control of the agenda-setting process by pro-integration actors. We observe voting coalitions increasingly dividing legislators along the pro-anti integration dimension of disagreement, but only in policy areas related to the crisis. In line with more qualitative assessments of the content of passed legislation, the implication is that pro-integration actors were able to shift policy further towards integration than they could have without the crisis.

« Estimating Vote-Specific Preferences from Roll-Call Data Using Conditional Autoregressive Priors | Publications List | Dyadic representation in a Westminster system »