Deborah Beim, Tom S Clark and Benjamin E Lauderdale, “The Effects of Panel Assignment on the US Court of Appeals in Death Penalty Cases”

We use the random assignment of three judge panels on the US Court of Appeals to measure the preferences of individual judges for granting relief in death penalty appeals, and how they are aggregated into decisions. We provide evidence that judges on the US Court of Appeals for the 5th, 6th, 9th, and 11th Circuits apply highly inconsistent thresholds for relief from death penalty sentences. In future versions of this paper, we will examine the extent to which en banc and Supreme Court review reduce the inconsistencies that arise as well as the ultimate effects of random panel assignment on whether and when appellants are executed.


« Refugee Roulette Revisited: Judicial Preference Variation and Aggregation on the Swiss Federal Administrative Court 2007-2012 | Publications List | Comparing Strategies for Estimating Constituency Opinion from National Survey Samples »

About

I am an Associate Professor of Social Research Methods at the London School of Economics and Political Science. From 2016-2019, I am an Associate Editor of the American Political Science Review. My research is focused on the measurement of political preferences from survey, voting, network and text data. Applications of these methods have included citizens, legislators and judges in the US, UK and EU.

Curriculum Vitae pdf

Subscribe

To receive updates from this site, you can subscribe to the RSS feed of all updates to the site in an RSS feed reader

Search