Benjamin E. Lauderdale and Tom S. Clark, “Scaling Meaningful Political Dimensions Using Texts and Votes”, American Journal of Political Science, 58(3)754-771.

 download pdf

 journal website

 replication archive

Item response theory models for roll-call voting data provide political scientists with parsimonious descriptions of political actors’ relative preferences. However, models using only voting data tend to obscure variation in preferences across different issues due to identification and labeling problems that arise in multidimensional scaling models. We propose a new approach to using sources of metadata about votes to estimate the degree to which those votes are about common issues. We demonstrate our approach using votes and opinions from the U.S. Supreme Court, using Latent Dirichlet Allocation to discover the extent to which different issues were at stake in different cases and estimating justice preferences within each of those issues. This approach can be applied using a variety of unsupervised and supervised topic models for text, community detection models for networks, or any other tool capable of generating discrete or mixture categorization of subject matter from relevant vote-specific data.

« A Partisan Gap in the Supply of Female Potential Candidates | Publications List | Under-performing, Over-performing, or Just Performing? The Limitations of Fundamentals-based Presidential Election Forecasting »